Providence @ Marquette

Monday, 6:00 PM ET | Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee | FS1
Spread: PROV +1.5 (-122) / MARQ -1.5 (-108) | ML: PROV +105 / MARQ -125 | O/U: 165.5

Here's a Big East matchup that tells the story of how dramatically a season can spiral. Marquette opened the year at #47 in KenPom, already a disappointment from their #29 finish last season. Now? They've cratered to around #120 in Massey's composite rankings, the single biggest drop in adjusted efficiency margin of any team in Division I. That's not a typo. Providence comes to Fiserv Forum as just 1.5-point underdogs against a team that was supposed to be fighting for an NCAA Tournament berth, not fighting for conference relevance.

KenPom Efficiency Analysis
Marquette Golden Eagles
Preseason Rank: #47
Current Rank: ~#120
Offensive Rating: 4th Worst Since 1997
3PT%: 30.8% (275th)
Rim FG%: 53.4% (340th)
eFG% Defense: 59.2% (sub-300)
Providence Friars
Preseason Rank: #48
Current Rank: ~#75
ATS Record: 10-8
Road Record: 7-3 Overall
Underdog Road: 3-0 SU
Style: Physical, Rebounding-focused

The Marquette Collapse: A KenPom Disaster

The numbers are staggering. Using KenPom's database back to 1997, this is currently the 4th worst Marquette offense ever recorded under Shaka Smart's watch. That includes teams that missed the tournament entirely. The Golden Eagles are shooting a miserable 30.8% from three-point range, ranking 275th in Division I. But here's the truly damning statistic: they're converting just 53.4% of their attempts at the rim, per CBB Analytics. That ranks 340th nationally. For context, you'd expect a decent high school team to finish around the rim better than that. It's not just that shots aren't falling; the offense has completely broken down at the most fundamental level.

Defensively, the story isn't much better. While KenPom shows a defensive rank of 74th that might look respectable at first glance, Torvik's quality-adjusted metrics tell a different tale. When you remove Q4 opponents, Marquette's defensive rank plummets to 138th. Their effective field goal percentage allowed sits at a catastrophic 59.2%, meaning non-cupcake opponents are shooting the ball absurdly well against them. The preseason projection had them finishing 18-13, tied for fourth in the Big East. Reality has been far crueler.

Providence: The Friars Who Travel Well

While Marquette has cratered, Providence has largely held serve with their preseason expectations. Kim English's squad entered at #48 in KenPom, the Friars' best preseason projection since 2019-20, and they've maintained that level. More importantly for tonight, they're 7-3 overall on the road and a perfect 3-0 straight up as underdogs in hostile environments. That's a team that doesn't get fazed by crowd noise or unfamiliar surroundings.

The Friars' identity is built on physicality and rebounding. They crash the offensive glass relentlessly, get to the free throw line, and make opponents work for every point in the paint. Against a Marquette team that can't finish at the rim themselves and allows easy baskets defensively, Providence's style matches up beautifully. Ed Cooley's fingerprints are still all over this program's DNA, and Big East battles are where that toughness shines brightest.

ATS Trends & Market Data
Marquette ATS Record5-14 (26.3%)
Providence ATS Record10-8 (55.6%)
Consensus on PROV +1.556%
Consensus on MARQ -1.544%
O/U Consensus (165.5)49% Over / 51% Under
Line MovementOpened MARQ -1, now -1.5

The Total: 165.5 Points of Context

The 165.5 total reflects both teams' offensive potential, though calling it "potential" for Marquette feels generous right now. Providence has hit the over in 20 of their last 31 games, indicating they're either scoring or allowing plenty of points, regardless of the opponent. Big East games tend to be physical and can slow to a crawl, but when Marquette's defense is this porous and Providence needs to score to stay competitive, points can pile up quickly. The consensus split is nearly even at 49% over, 51% under, suggesting the market finds this number appropriately set.

The Bottom Line

The 5-14 ATS record for Marquette screams "do not trust." This is a team that has failed to meet expectations all season long, and the market clearly learned that lesson months ago. Yet they're still laying points at home? Providence's road credentials are legitimate, their physical style travels well, and they've proven they belong on the floor with better teams in conference play. 5, but the Friars are still getting more than a bucket as a gift. In a game that feels destined to be decided in the final two minutes, that extra possession of cushion matters enormously.

Columbia @ Yale

Monday, 2:00 PM ET | John J. Lee Amphitheater, New Haven | ESPN+
Spread: COL +8.5 (-110) / YALE -8.5 (-110) | ML: COL +320 / YALE -420 | O/U: 152.5

Ivy League basketball doesn't get the national attention it deserves, but this matchup features one of the most lethal shooting teams in all of college basketball. Yale's 44.0% three-point shooting ranks second nationally, and they've won 20 of their last 21 home games against conference opponents at John J. Lee Amphitheater. That's not a home court advantage; that's a fortress. Columbia arrives at 12-5 overall but just 1-2 in league play after dropping their last game to Brown in overtime, 86-80.

Yale's Elite Shooting Profile
3PT%
44.0%
National Rank
#2
Home vs Ivy
20-1
Nick Townsend
17.4 PPG

The Townsend Factor: A Do-Everything Force

Nick Townsend is the kind of player who makes Ivy League basketball worth watching. At 17.4 points, 7.5 rebounds, and 4.7 assists per game, he's doing a little bit of everything for the Bulldogs. But he's far from alone. Yale has three players averaging double figures who can all shoot the three, creating a nightmare spacing situation for opposing defenses. Riley Fox just dropped 21 points in their 102-68 demolition of Cornell, showing that this offense can absolutely bury teams when the looks fall.

Yale's system is built on patience and ball movement. They don't force contested shots; they swing the ball until someone's open in the corner or cutting to the basket. Against a Columbia defense that just allowed 86 points to Brown in overtime, that methodical approach could result in a shooting gallery. The Lions shoot 49% from the field and average 80.9 points per game offensively, so they can score. But allowing 70.8 points defensively to a team that shoots 44% from three is a recipe for getting run out of the gym.

Columbia's Path to Covering

Kenny Noland leads the Lions with 16.6 points per game on 46.6% shooting and a remarkable 94.1% from the free throw line. He also dishes out 3.5 assists per game, serving as the engine of Columbia's offense. The Lions' rebounding (42.4 per game) gives them second-chance opportunities, but they'll need those extra possessions to keep pace with Yale's efficiency.

The path to covering this 8.5-point spread runs through forcing turnovers and converting in transition before Yale can set their half-court defense. That's the only way to disrupt the Bulldogs' rhythm and prevent them from getting comfortable launching threes. The problem? Yale doesn't turn it over much, and they've seen everything opponents can throw at them in this building. Coaches have extensive film on the Bulldogs, but knowing what's coming and stopping it are two entirely different things.

Ivy League Context
Yale Record13-3 (2-1 Ivy)
Columbia Record12-5 (1-2 Ivy)
Yale Home Win Streak6 Games
Columbia Last GameL 80-86 OT vs Brown
Yale Last GameW 102-68 vs Cornell
First Meeting This SeasonYes

The Total: Pace-Controlled Basketball

The 152.5 total suggests a game played in the mid-70s for both teams, which aligns with Ivy League basketball's typical tempo. Both programs prefer to use the shot clock and minimize transition opportunities. Yale will methodically work for high-percentage looks, and Columbia will try to match that patience while looking for moments to push pace. The Lions' overtime loss to Brown shows they can get into shootouts, but Yale's defensive discipline should keep this more structured than Columbia's recent games.

The Bottom Line

Double-digit spreads in Ivy League play always carry risk because these teams are so familiar with each other. Columbia won't be surprised by anything Yale runs, but execution is what matters. Can the Lions match Yale's shooting efficiency? History says no. Yale's 44% from three is elite at any level, and at home in conference play, the Bulldogs have been nearly unbeatable. The 8.5-point spread feels like it should be closer to 10 based on the efficiency gap, but that's what familiarity does in conference matchups.

George Washington @ George Mason

Monday, 5:00 PM ET | EagleBank Arena | CBSSN
Spread: GW +2.5 (-110) / GMU -2.5 (-110) | ML: GW +130 / GMU -155 | O/U: 154.5

The Colonial Clash comes to EagleBank Arena, and the efficiency numbers tell a stark tale. George Mason enters at a stunning 17-1 overall and 5-0 in A-10 play, riding an eight-game winning streak. George Washington is a respectable 12-6 with a 3-2 conference mark, but the defensive disparity between these teams is massive. We're talking about the 65th-ranked defensive rating in the country against the 308th. That's not a gap; that's a canyon.

Defensive Efficiency Comparison
GMU Def Rating
98.3
GMU Def Rank
#65
GW Def Rating
115.0
GW Def Rank
#308

George Mason's Defensive Identity

The Patriots have built their remarkable season on suffocating defense. They're allowing just 67.2 points per game, good for 38th nationally, and that defensive rating of 98.3 points per 100 possessions ranks 65th in Division I. They pack the paint, force teams to beat them from three, and rarely foul. Kory Mincy leads the offensive attack with 16.6 points, 3.8 rebounds, and 3.6 assists per game, but the defense is what's carried them to 17-1.

George Mason's three-point shooting is quietly lethal at 40.9%, meaning teams can't sag off and pack the paint against them. They'll make you pay for overcommitting inside. The Patriots are disciplined, patient, and absolutely refuse to beat themselves. That's the recipe for an eight-game winning streak and a 5-0 start in conference play. At EagleBank Arena, where they've been nearly perfect this season, they're a nightmare matchup for most A-10 opponents.

George Washington's Offensive Firepower vs Defensive Liability

The Revolutionaries can absolutely put up points. Their 87.1 points per game ranks 24th nationally, powered by Rafael Castro's 16.3 points and 8.5 rebounds per game. This is a team that pushes pace and looks for early offense opportunities. The problem? That 115.0 defensive rating ranks 308th in the country, and against a team that executes as precisely as George Mason, that liability gets exposed in devastating fashion.

George Washington's offensive numbers look impressive until you realize how much they're giving back on the other end. Allowing 73.1 points per game to A-10 competition means they're in shootouts constantly. That approach can work against teams with comparable defensive issues, but George Mason is the polar opposite. The Patriots will grind possessions, force contested looks, and turn this into exactly the kind of half-court battle where their efficiency advantage compounds with every trip down the floor.

Offensive vs Defensive Profiles
George Mason (17-1)
PPG: 78.8 (134th)
Opp PPG: 67.2 (38th)
3PT%: 40.9%
Scoring Diff: +11.6
A-10 Record: 5-0
Win Streak: 8 Games
George Washington (12-6)
PPG: 87.1 (24th)
Opp PPG: 73.1 (163rd)
Def Rating: 115.0 (308th)
Pace: High Tempo
A-10 Record: 3-2
Key Player: Castro (16.3/8.5)

Why The Spread Feels Light

Some sharp analysts believe this spread should be closer to 5 or 6 points based on the defensive disparity alone. George Washington's 308th-ranked defensive rating against a team shooting 40.9% from three is asking for trouble. George Mason has the discipline to slow this game down, work the clock, and get high-percentage looks while forcing GW into contested shots on the other end. That's a formula for a comfortable cover, even if the final margin looks closer than the game felt.

The Rivalry Factor

This is more than just an A-10 game in the DMV. These programs recruit the same territory, and bragging rights matter enormously to fans on both sides. George Washington needs this road win more than George Mason needs the home victory, which could create interesting late-game dynamics. The Revolutionaries will play desperate basketball, looking for any edge to stay competitive. But desperation against a team this disciplined often leads to forced shots and turnovers, exactly what Mason's defense is designed to create.

A-10 Conference Context
George Mason A-10 Odds4th Best to Win
Mason Home RecordExcellent
GW Road RecordMixed
Scoring DifferentialGMU +11.6 / GW +14.0
Style MatchupPace vs Defense
Tournament ImplicationsA-10 Tournament Path

The Bottom Line

This 2.5-point spread underestimates the gap between these programs right now. George Mason is the class of the A-10 through five games, and their defensive identity is perfectly suited to neutralize George Washington's up-tempo attack. The Patriots won't get into a track meet; they'll control pace, execute in the half-court, and force GW into the kind of contested, late-clock shots that their defense devours. EagleBank Arena will be rocking for a rivalry game, and Mason's discipline should shine through when it matters most. The Revolutionaries have the offensive talent to keep it interesting, but talent alone doesn't beat systematic defensive excellence.